Creative Exposure

I don’t have much occasion to take photographs of running water during my normal daily photo walks. But as I was walking around downtown Akron, working on my “Urban Abstracts” theme assignment, I discovered Lock 4 Park. Located along the Ohio & Erie Canal, it is a renovated plaza, home of outdoor lunches for downtown workers and evening jazz concerts. Quite a surprising discovery within the downtown environment, the area provided a wealth of urban abstract photo opportunities for my class project.

The park is also home to a small waterfall – perhaps part of the historic canal lock system. In any case, I took advantage of the moving water to test out the concept of “creative exposure” from Bryan Peterson’s book, Understanding Exposure.  As Peterson says, “Most picture taking opportunities have at least six possible combinations of f/stop and shutter speed to get a correct exposure”. This is based on the concept of reciprocity between the elements of the photographic triangle – aperture, shutter speed and ISO.  However, in Peterson’s view, what will set the final image apart is whether the photographer captured the best “creative” exposure – the combination of depth-of-field and motion capture that yields the most dramatic and imaginative shot.

For the Lock 4 waterfall, I took two different images-one where my goal was to freeze the motion of the water (fast shutter speed) and the other where I attempted to create a silky, cotton-candy feel to the flowing stream (slow shutter speed). Since I am photographically motion-challenged, I was pleased with the final results of my experiment – shooting in shutter-priority mode is a walk on the wild side for me.

And yet, I’m not sure which of these images would qualify as the best “creative” exposure. What do you think? Do you prefer the silky smooth flow or the crashing, plummeting water? Which do you think captures the essence of the scene?

Regardless of which image is your favorite, this exploration certainly demonstrates the truth to Peterson’s idea that, as the photographer, we hold the key to what our images communicate. The same scene taken with two different exposures results in two distinct images; two photographs communicating different ideas and emotions. Soft versus hard; smooth versus choppy; flowing versus rough.

So, have you thought about what it is that you want to communicate?


Posted on March 29, 2011, in Photography and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. I really enjoyed comparing both photographs Mom! It is amazing how beautiful they both look. I personally like the second one only because that is how I wished water really looked; however, the first one captures nature’s true essence. I love them both! 🙂

    • Hannah,
      Thanks for taking a look and commenting on the photos. I can’t make up my mind either – I like them both for different reasons, just as you have pointed out.

  2. I vote the long exposure. Love the flow of the water. Also I like how the long exposure allowed time to illuminate some of the details of the columns in the backgrounds.

    • I like the long exposure as well – mostly because it is something that I have never captured – it’s always exciting to experiment successfully. I discovered a new place that I had never been before and created the “cotton-candy water effect” – recipe for a successful photo excursion.

I greatly appreciate your comments!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: